I recently had one of those days when you realize that actually, your life is one big lie. It becomes clear as the crystal in houses with lots of maids and butlers ( who else, but those in such houses can afford crystal of any quality worth speaking of, and who but the servants would otherwise bring the crystal to its state of clarity?) or--do not despair, ye proles!-- very good dishwashing liquid, that you have been lying to everyone just by your existence and your corporeal self. For example, everyone has always thought me slender, indeed THIN, but as a result of having a superb tailor at home and excellent shopping skills abroad, these beguiled people do not see the bulges and overflows that would otherwise appear in inappropriate places on my person. [Digression, Anon, do you see what I mean about my sub-clauses and dependent phrases? Totally without discipline, modesty or prudence, let alone shame. To continue:] You are, in fact, a fraud in-itself and for-itself. You embody scam, scams, scamicity, scamaciousness and all other manner of iniquitous deceit and deviousness. Your so-called competence at work is a joke, every single compliment ever to come your way was based on pity, and, naturally, any awards or prizes or publications were achieved entirely by accident aggravated by the fact that the people in charge had you mixed up with a total stranger with a similar name. It follows, therefore, that you’ve been lying to your friends your whole life too, or why would they ever have bothered to befriend you, instead of disdaining you like the pond scum you are? Bottom dweller, begone!
By some inadvertent miracle, you have managed to keep the truth of your absolutely worthless, pointless, zygote-that-should-never-have-been true self from your nearest and dearest, who have, poor things, bought into your cleverly Copperfield-conjured and flattering illusion of yourself. (You do i’ wiv mirrors.)
Today,however (ominous organ music, please) Your Nemesis Cometh! Today is the day when you are going to be busted. This is the day that the awards committee will decide they want their fifty-thousand dollar grant back because your project is rubbish; your department will realize that they mistakenly sent their rather splendid offer of employment to you instead of to that really cool applicant from Santa Cruz; colleagues who had formerly admired, encouraged and indeed, supported your ambitions line up to go on national television to declaim that they believe themselves to have been under hypnosis at the time; your students, in a Damascan moment of their own, shall have, yea, the very scales drop from their eyes and at last comprehend the stark fact that you know nothing about your subject, or about anything else, whilst we’re at it. Plus, all your least favourite, most obnoxious and maximumly/maximisedly horrid relatives come to visit, and insist on telling everyone of their connection to you, whilst also explaining how similar and close you have always been. There you will be, with your picture-of-Dorian-Gray-ish soul buck nekked and exposed, with all its deformities and warps in full public view. These things of course, ultimately don't actually happen, but expecting them to makes the situation quite horrifying enough. Those of you with active imaginations, beware. The more creative you are, the more alarming the scenarios you can envision.
In my less drama-queen moments, I know quite well there are many reasons to have those sorts of days, and really, I am lucky that I do not have them very often. To make up for the lack of frequency, however, I seem to amplify mine to infinite intensities. Perhaps that is why I take note when I DO have them, trying to figure out what brought them on. I am not bi-polar myself,(sometimes a cigar is just a cigar, honestly) but it is true, however, that having this rather unlovely day did make me empathise deeply with those who are afflicted thus, so perhaps it was not all for naught. My moral fibre must have received quite a booster shot there. Usually I can track the spoor of my melt-downs to specific periods of unusual stress, or specific events, or something that my mind had hidden from me but was worrying away at by itself (it is well known that my brain is in the pay of my enemies, the bastards!) or just a particularly unfortunate and unexpected matrix of the contexts and events and decisions that produce my daily life.
On the other hand, I have decided that there is a general sort of enabling condition that makes these days possible, especially if you are black, a woman, and in fairly competitive or challenging circumstances. What is this necessary if not sufficient condition? Why, THE MYTH OF THE STRONG BLACK WOMAN, of course. It is so simple and so clear that it is somewhat amazing that we are still bamboozled. You see, we (“we”being the black women who are the “johns” of this particular scam) think that being an SBW is something to which one should aspire; we feel complimented when we are included in the category of others similarly valorized; and we blame ourselves for any indication that we are falling below the standards of the SBW. Is this not the most delicious trick ever played on anyone? On some levels, it is so beautifully clever that it leaves those Anglo Leasing schemers in the kindergarten class of con-artists to which they rightly belong. It is said that the greatest feat that Lucifer, Son of Morning, the Fallen One, etc., ever achieved, was convincing people that he did not exist. Well, SBW have been inflicted and infected with the reverse syndrome. The greatest achievement the rest of the world ever achieved was convincing black women that SBW existed, and that our job was to grow up into one such, subsequently to be one in the most exemplary fashion possible, and faithfully to remain one without pause or rest until the grim reaper relieved us of the burdens of our mortality.
It is really terrifyingly, astonishingly and ineffably well-crafted, this myth. Insofar as, so long as we are kept either desiring, or believing ourselves actually to be, Strong Black Women, there is no amount of pure nonsense, abuse, overwork, ingratitude, exploitation, underappreciation, and just plain shit that we will not put up with. You see, SBW, of course, can make ten dollars stretch into meals for a week, clothes for everyone, payment of bills, and school fees, etc.,— this is just a well known and, indeed, required characteristic of SBW. SBW are, by nature, ready, nay, eager to work five jobs at a time so as to feed and clothe their nearest and dearest without expecting, and more properly, absolutely rejecting any help. One has, after all, one’s pride as a Strong Black Woman. SBW are also expected to give command performances as free, endlessly sympathetic and reliable therapists, counselors, substitute mothers, and wise women, who willingly provide free emotional and mental labour to everyone else.
You have a problem? Go and cry on an SBW shoulder, which is guaranteed (why else are they SBW?) to be there, to provide cleenex, food and appropriate ego validation and finally, to manage to complete the four hours worth of work interrupted and delayed by your tales of woe. This function of the SBW is usually taken advantage of by non-SBW without so much as a “by your leave”, much less an offer to return at a more convenient time. This is because of course, your (non-SBW) problems are real and agonizing, your world has been shattered by recurrent crisis #57, and you know that the SBW will understand, even if she has never had such a crisis herself. SBW, nota bene, cannot themselves complain, may not have moments of self-doubt, and never need a sympathetic ear as a balm to their problems, which a) they rarely seem to have and b)they are anyway self-evidently capable of dealing with on their own in the expected silent fortitude of their kind. SBW, it is understood, do not suffer emotionally as much as the other, more fragile and helpless non-SBW population: because they ARE strong, and thus, better able to endure. This is like having a bullet-proof vest when the shooting starts: the unprotected get to scream and wail and run for cover whilst the SBW who are already armoured and thus have no fear, should promptly assume their assigned rescue service, feeding service, administrative, and problem-solving roles. Whence, in addition to everything else, comes the ugly fact that SBW are granted less time for grieving, assumed to have less sense of loss and suffering and required to have a faster recovery time from trauma than everybody else, so that they can go and take care of the anguish and malaise of others. Well, naturally. It is an SBW thing: you wouldn't understand and are very careful not even to try.
Think about it. How do we think of Micere Mugo (or insert favourite female role model here?) Do you know how much CRAP that woman has had to go through? Do we ever ask ourselves what sort of toll it took on her, what scars were left, whether she ever needed to lock herself in the bathroom and weep, if she ever thought of giving up and why she didn't, what demons plagued her at night whilst the world slept, what private spaces of knowing pain and knowing suffering her poetry comes from, whether she ever lost her faith and her certainty in the cause, and if, indeed, by now she is not so tired by all those years of giving, giving and giving--to us, I am reminded to add--that if we had any decency we would stop taking from her? It is not that we have been to the well one too many times, rather it is that we seem to think that the well itself will continue to be there even if we dismantle its walls and supporting platforms in a sort of Platonic "the perfection of the form of the well" fantastical complacency.
Many of us who have or have had the kind of mothers or aunts or honorary aunts whom we admire and who make us proud and to whom we owe, well, um, that would be-- everything?— should know what I mean. Whilst acknowledging all their sacrifices, their struggles overcome and their achievements, have you ever thought that they accomplished then not BECAUSE of some spurious “extra” strength but despite the weaknesses common to us all? I’ve thought of my own mother, whom I have idolized my whole life, because she did just amazing things. She was the first this and the first that. She was the only African woman ever to do x. She left a lasting legacy through her work in y. She also managed to bring me up, protect and shelter me, and mould me into a competent human being…but what about her life? How often do I ask myself if she was ever frightened, insecure, confused, lost? How often do I ask if she ever yearned for opportunities lost, regretted decisions made, missed absent friends? The answer to that would be “once.” Today. Because before today, she was just absolutely perfect and pristine. Before today I would have reacted to such a suggestion of human failings and fears in MY mother with snorting and indignant incredulity—except I realized how wrong that would be. Pedestals do not really give one much room to move or to be.
The problem with the myth of the SBW is this. It falsely supposes that SBW have powers, skills and capacities beyond those of ordinary mortals (sort of like super heroes) so that their achievements are a)not as difficult to attain as they would be for others and b)somehow inhere in the very quality of SBW-ness, itself. When you look at this logic for long enough, it becomes pretty obvious that we don’t need to thank SBW or even to congratulate them. After all, they have only achieved what their innate SBW-ness allows, nay, compels them to achieve. Where is the agency of these women here? How do we honour them by making their achievements banal by not contextualizing them in human frailty? If Superman leaps over a tall building at a single bound, well, yawn, stretch and change the channel. If I were ever to leap over a tall building at a single bound, I WOULD EXPECT SOME SERIOUS ATTENTION, ASTONISHMENT, ADORATION and for everyone to realize that having done all this leaping about, I would fairly obviously need a good long rest. Conversely, I most certainly would NOT appreciate having immediately presented to me another building, over which I am also expected to leap without question or hesitation.
Well, that is it for me. SBW are permanently OFF the list of things that I want to be when I grow up. I am going to treasure and revel in and treat tenderly all my weaknesses and mistakes and failures—all of which I have in amazingly copious quantities--because they make my achievements that much more precious to me.
Let the Age of the Weak Black Women begin!!!
Tuesday, January 31, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
63 comments:
Amen.
I did come to that same conclusion sometime back WM.
Appropriate, given the hagiography of Coretta King that's in progress.
Your pulse is on the world--might be in the genes, eh?
(Shameless googler that I am!)
I agree with the first parts of your stream of consciousness. Nicely expressed, well-written.
As to the later parts, the abbreviation SBW reminds me a wee bit too much of SUV, but that is probably only my personal sense of typography or the need of a new set of magnifying reading glasses.
For an excellent treatment of this mythical image, let me refer to (and even recommend) Patricia Hill Collins' latest book, which I am right now rev... reading. Not only is it an intellectually brilliant treatise with great power of synthesis, not only does it show a very mature, sovereign disposition of content, and occasionally a fine, light, and never acerbic humour, as is very helpful and soothing when treating such a dire topic. It is also written in excellent English, and both your style (parentheses, cola, semicola, brackets may be queer, but deliberate obfuscation and wanton jargonism are not) and your thinking can vastly benefit from digesting it. Sure, you might loose a few Butlerisms on the way, but they always appeared badly glued-on anyhow, so it would be no big loss. :-)
@Guess--thus proving me quite correct. I have not had a single new idea since, oh, since I last wrote a paper for publication. And that wasn't even particularly new: three other people had written about it already. So, sigh.
@Keguro--there's a thing on Coretta King out, or forthcoming? Really, why am I the last to know anyhing?
@Anon, the Collins book is one of those on my shelf that I am "just about" to read, after I've read the other twenty sitting beside it, and done a million other things besides. I'll move it up to the top of the list. Butlerisms? That surprises me, as I don't often write about gender and where else would Butler come in? But I'll watch for that. And I heard you! You are reviewing the book, so for what publication, so I can watch for it? Oh no, that would mess up your anon-ness wouldn't it? I am AGAIN not being the sharpest knife in the drawer. Thank you for your thoughts, and yes, you are right, Patricia Collins does indeed write beautifully,almost lyrically.
Oh, Anon, I forgot to say...SUV cracked me up. However, it is rather appropriate when you think about it. After all, something that is supposed to perform under any and all conditions on any and all surfaces? Sounds familiar to me. Although, may I say that I am completely intimidated by anyone who has a sense of typography: it isn't enough just to know the meaning of the words, now I have to worry about how they LOOK as well? I am very glad I arrived at this side of the examination divide before I,er, "met" you, is all I can say.
Hapana! I don't know who this other Anon is, but W.M., please don't change even an iota of your writing style. You write marvellously and you have a unique voice. I looked you up on Rate My Professor, and I agree with all the "classy but witty" comments. "Can explain difficult concepts in a witty and thoughtful way." "First time I ever felt that a professor really cared about me as a person" "Excellent prof." Your students obviously know when they have a good thing going since I noticed that one of them said you were "the best prof. in the university." I am sure you are. I have read your currency work, and it is brilliant and elegant. If it ain't broke don't fix it. Don't let people who don't understand you or appreciate you change you, please. And of course I agree with your SBW observations. I have not read Collins and I don't need to, since I have you instead. LOL @zygote-that-should-never-have-been. Pole for the bad day, but if it drove you to soaring heights of language like this, consider having more of them.
Anon. The one with taste.
Anon-without-taste, ushindwe na kwenda kabisa!
I haven't posted for a while. Just terminal laziness. But now I also have to ingia the arena, nani, because of this blatant uchokozi. Does everyone know that some mysterious and deluded person actually referred to W.M's writing as "gibberish?" on Keguro's blog? W.M., you were far too gracious in your response, there and again here, methinks. This person is an "anon" who calls himself or herself "Osas" so of course, there is no evidence of his or her writing to compare to W.M.'s. I think it is a man, I don't know why. I don't know if the "gibberish" anon is the same as the one who just posted his stupid comments here, but I suspect so.
In any case why is this idiot Anon writing to her as if HE is HER Prof? We could care less about which book he is reading, but to suggest to W.M. that she read it for the improvement of her writing is a bit rich, nani! Is it me or was the tone distinctly patronising? Is it me or have you noticed that W.M., however much she may know about something, NEVER patronises her readers?
Yet, we who have been reading her blog from the early days know that she is the Queen of the written word, so what is this person talking about? As for her work and teaching, I too, raced over to Rate My Professor to check her out. I read 10 responses. 3 were negative, the rest of the 7 glowing. I think the 3 probably failed the class, or never went to class at all since 2 of them called her "dry" and one "monotonous". To which the others replied:
"Dry? Are these people on drugs? I love this woman. For the first time, I feel as if a professor cares about me..she likes and believes in us: treats us like people with minds. She is also brilliant and Da bomb! The best!"
"We need more professors like Wambui, despite the difficulty there may be in explaining some complex theory...she does this in a classy and witty manner. I am completely impressed and I am beginning to find my other classes 'dry'now."
"the greatest prof at UofT..challenging and engaging, witty and hot!"
"One of a kind and I wish there were more like her"
"...for the short time I was in the class it was the best I have ever taken--this class will open your mind and eyes. I went to talk to her and she is really caring and talks TO you and not AT you"
"the material was truly difficult but her lectures clarify but never simplify. She is outstanding and unforgettable as a brilliant and fierce instructor and genuinely friendly as a person. This course had my head spinning in an excellent way."
And so on and on
My point is this: All Hail the Queen! Those lucky students who listen to her lectures every week, and those of us who read her every post think she is, in her student's words "Da Bomb." So, who is this whoever who thinks he can just talk about her ovyo ovyo? Shame on him!
@ W.M. I'm sorry you had a bad day. The difference is that most people just have bad days, (and the inane anon obviously has a permanent bad day) and do nothing about it, and you used your bad day to make us think and laugh. Also, I believe that knowing that the Queen herself has bad days, doubts and failures of confidence every now and then made the rest of us feel okay about our own bad days.
LOL: "despair not, ye proles!" Absolutely a "W.M.ism"
As always, Shukria.
And Pole sana for blogging on your blog, but I was just so irritated. On my own behalf, not on yours. You need no defending when your work speaks so eloquently for itself.
I've never posted a comment, but I always read your blog. I love it. People who criticise you are just jealous. Fred is right about your writing and you are right about the Strong Black Women saga. I'll join you in being a Weak Black Woman!
My toes are curling, I can't stop smiling, I'm probably going to cry in a most humiliating manner and I'm feeling the love. Thank you very much y'all. I am, well, I am both astonished and immensely grateful to all of you.
@Anon #2, thanks much for the defense, support and encouragement, brother, but honestly I LIKE criticism when it is constructive--it keeps me learning and it keeps me humble. It's all good.
As to the "gibberish" Anon, well, he DID go to the trouble of tracking down and reading my dissertation, which is something, and dissertation are notoriously quite bad, being the first full length work that baby intellectuals attempt: they are sort of like union cards in that they only have to be good enough to get you into the club. I myself don't think it was "gibberish," however, people are entitled to their opinions if they are INFORMED opinions. If I am prepared to be called Brilliant, then I've got tobe as willing to accept dissenting opinions and thankfully, I received enough compliments and rave reviews on the dissertation to balance out the criticisms.
I too do not know if this anon posting here and the "gibberish" anon over at chez Keguro are the same, but I DID ask the "gibberish" Anon a.k.a. Osas for further and more extended comments and criticisms, so if this is him, (grammar query: if this is he?) he is only complying with my request. If it is another person entirely, the comments are still useful and thoughtful, and anyway, I'd LIKE to read Patricia Hill Collins. I can't say that I delight in hearing that my style and my content are as lacking as he says, but really, if I can't stand the heat, what on earth am I doing in the kitchen? Fish or cut bait, as they say. After all, I don't have to agree; only to listen seriously and to consider honestly the merits of what he says.
@Fred, He Said: well, whatever else, I am immensely thankful to the Anon that he or she brought you out of retirement! I've missed you! And please, watch out, I can hardly fit my head through the door after reading your post. Aw shucks! That was one of the nicest things anyone has ever done for me, my valiant knight, and I thank you for it.
@Bliss. Great! We'll start a club of WBW (to the first anon: now this looks like BMW inverted--I just can't win for losing..) I hope, having broken the "fear of first post" barrier, that you will visit often and lengthily.
@Everyone: Patricial Hill Collins IS a great writer and thinker. Judith Butler is a great thinker but um, she isn't a great writer--reading her takes enough concetrantion to give the averagely intelligent reader a headache. I think this is the difference that the first anon was pointing out to me. On the other hand (how many hads have I used now? I'm probably on the fourth or fifth, like a statue of Kali) Butler is usually worth the effort, as is her peer in difficulty ratings, Spivak. Or at least, I think they are.
Of course my writing--informally here on the blog or more formally in my research--can use improvement, by any means necessary. Whose cannot? If you stop moving forward you stall and die.
@my students--it is a fairly well known principle that the people you like tend to like you back. I adore my students, for the effort they make (my classes are HARD), their refusal to give up even when the going gets tough, their trust that I will see them through the thickets of the texts, eventually, and most of all: their final triumph when they realise that they are much better and can do much more advanced work than they ever believed of themselves. I probably get more out of them than the other way around. They are great to be with, really AND they keep me laughing and enjoying myself for all two hours week after week. I love my job. I'm not paid enough, but I love my job.
In defense of the 3 student anti-fans,I simply happen to be one of those people about whom people cannot be either moderate or neutral. They tend to like me, a lot, or they despise me, a lot. Thus, one can only be grateful that those who like me are in a highly satisfyingly large majority. Besides, if no-one criticised me, no one would leap to my defense and shower compliments on me as has happened here and bring me to my knees in sheer delight. (I am unwomaned!) I am the very farthest thing that one could be from a Pollyana--my cynicism (sp?) but in this case I would say that every cloud...
Oh My! That made me want to stand up and cheer!!! I totally agree, 100%. i gave up on that SBW nonsense years and years ago when I was a young struggling single mother. a lot of black people, especially other black women, acted like I was crazy when I talked about needing a man, needing a husband, needing a father for my kids.
Heh! I've just read the "gibberish" comment. What was up with that, nawauliza?
I suppose I am anon #3.
@W.M.You are a lovely lady,you have a great mind and you have exquisite manners. Your diplomatic display on your posted comments to everyone shows this last quality particularly well.
I just cannot let it go at that, though.
Me, I think the "gibberish" anon is an asshole, and the patricia hil collins anon a pretentious and condescending idiot. Kwani he thinks the rest of us have not read other books and so are not able to rate W.M.'s writing relative to other writers? Does he think that those of us who love her writing only have James Hadley Chase to compare her to? I've read Patricia Hill Collins, I like her very much and I would not give up one second of W.M. reading for Collins.
I don't know if people know this, but the journals that W.M.'s scholarly articles appear in are the HARDEST to get into, with about a 1% acceptance rate. In fact, I think Kwani acceptance ratio are about the same--certainly not above 10%. Every way you slice it then, W.M. is in the 99th percentile at best and in the 90th percentile at worst. So, I would say that her peers find her work and her expressive abilities rather impressive, ama?wouldn't you? Her students' opinions we have all heard about.
One other thing. What is up the large object obviously implanted far up "gibberish/Osas's" butt? As far as I could see, he was writing a completely unrelated comment to Keguro, when out of nowhere comes this attack on W.M. Completely unnecessary and thus vile and unnaceptable. However "scholarly" this 'gentleman' thinks himself to be, he has yet to get any degrees in social skills. Fred is right, I HATE people who do stuff like that.
It is such a bad Kenyan trait! bring down anyone who is doing well so that your little insecure self can feel better. Basically, he is saying "who does she think she is?" just said more rudely and with more malice.
Sorry,W.M.--never thought the day would come when I would disagree with you.
*very shamefacedly* I learned to write from Judy and Gayatri
Back to school I go . . .
This is Anon #3 again.
I can't leave this alone until I have added the following.
I happen to know that W.M. is in demand as a peer reviewer for scholarly journals and other publications. I'm in this field, and word gets around. Peer reviewers are academics that journals send submitted papers to, to ask for their opinion on the scholarly merits of the submission. This decides if the paper is published or not, at least in part. People ask W.M to do peer reviews not only because she is good at what she does, thorough and prompt with her evaluations,relatively speaking. She also manages to be very critical, even to the point of rejection, where necessary, without losing her politeness and her gentleness about the paper she is reviewing. I work at one of these journals and she has reviewed papers for us in the past. As one who not only works in publishing but sometimes tries to get published, I really really appreciate the last quality, which is why I am so pissed off at at the effrontery of calling someone's work (especially this particular person) "gibberish." People put a lot of their hearts and souls into their research and writing, and one word dismissals indicate to me a petty and insensitive mind. The gibberish comment was simply wrong, ethically and professionally. You might want to consider learning from W.M. on this point, whoever said that.
But Keguro, what does that prove apart from the fact that you are much more intelligent than the rest of us, and therefore can read difficult texts easier than we can. Remember I had said "people of average intelligence" meaning about my level, not "people of superior intelligence, which is where you would be. You see? Irrefutable conclusion!
I'm curious. If you are a Butler/Spivak person, how come your writing doesn't get to be "gibberish" too? I am not EVEN a Butler/Spivak person, although I will admit to being a postcolonial theorist. Just because you are prettier than I am people are nicer to you ?(refer to post on beauty and wealth). Life is hell and then you become an academic, sigh.
W.M. (drawing triangles with my toe on the floor) I am one of those freeloaders who always read your blog and never comment. But here I am today to join the bouting!
Lakini, let me understand the bout here first. People are arguing over whether W.M. can write or not? Is that a question???? Si, if you don't like her writing you step? Why stay stirring up trouble?
I agree with everbody above about the "gibberish" remark. I've never been to any of her lectures or read any of her writing. Excluding, this blog, of course. But someone so many students love EVEN THOUGH the coursework is huge and who makes her students feel like people must be doing something right. I've also read other comments on other blog posts that W.M. has put up, and it is obvious that I am not the only one to jienjoy sana. By the way, do you remember the digression in the first paragraph? Me I think it was not directed to the anon who answered. I think it was a continuation of the Anon dialogue from the last post, from the anon wrote "I love your writing". W.M. was ati being shy and modest, saying she is ati bila discipline. Ama, W.M.?
Lakini nyinyi nyote! Is she running for president, ama ni nini? Let us take it for granted that she is extremely good, knows how to make her students happy, can write the hell out of anything, and is an interesting person. How is the rest our biz?
And to the first anon who answered today, if I wanted a reading list, I would ask Keguro or W.M. because I trust them, not some jua kali kijana who doesn't even have a blog. If he has one, then sindi he should say where it is?
Wazuri wajiuza.....
Hi WM, thanks so much for your kind words on my blog! I just wanted to let you know I am married, not single...In my earlier post I was referring to when I was a single mother. My husband and I have been together 10 years, married for 7, but I was a single mother for many years with 2 kids prior to him.
Um, everyone. I think I may be shortly burned at the stake for heresy. I just left the following post on Brother Jero's blog, who had written this lovely memorial essay for Coretta Scott King. (Keguro: you realise that this is ALL your fault, don't you?) Everybody else was very busily R.I.P.ing and full of acclaim and nil nisi etc., when
I wrote:
I'm sorry to be the dissenter, but everywhere I turn I am attacked by images, stories and memorials to Coretta Scott King. I mean no disrespect when I say, okay, enough already! She was a great woman, since everyone says so, but I am tired of hearing about it and anyway I don't believe it.
Um, can we talk about the name of your blog now ? (I was once in that play, "Trials and Tribulations" so I fell in love with your blog name at once!!) Or the "pirates" who are about to be charged in Kenya? or the Narc meltdown? I feel terrible for raining on everyone's Coretta parade, and I apologise, but my sympathy for women who achieve their fame by having married or being descended from the right man is limited indeed. Yes, I know. There goes Mrs. Ghandi (both of them, the Indian one and the Italian one), the Pakistani woman whose name has simply just dropped out of my mind this isntance, Hilary Clinton, that yellow-themed woman who was in the Philipines, and all manner of U.S. first ladies, and etc., ad nauseum etc. Not to mention African first ladies--in this respect, thank god for Liberia! Even Graca Macel/Mandela, much as I like her, is famous first for having married her first husband, and now for being hooked up with Madiba.
It pisses me off. Surely my sister XXs, we can do better than that? As my college t-shirt used to say, (I went to a college that supplied either three or four U.S. first ladies and an unspecified number of same commodity abroad): "Surely there must be a better way to get one of us into the White House!"
What did Mrs. King actually DO? As opposed to being famous for being Martin Luther King's wife and being a celebrity on that account? What did she herself DO?
Okay, I'll shut up now, but not before noting that all, ALL my favourite Kenyan role models (the women, I mean) are celebrated in their own right--at least the ones I respect--and NOT, and often in spite of and over the opposition of, whoever it is they might be or have been married to. Makes you go hmmm, doesn't it?
A cigar is almost always a phallic symbol especially if you dream about it.
What is the female equivalent of this anyway?
Being strong denies you lots of privileges because you can take care of it -whatever weakness- and those of others.
I shall refrain from commenting on your Vassar t-shirt; at least, US presidents, as womanizing as some may have been (JFK notably, Clinton was harmless in comparison), were no Julius Sunkulis. Let me just say that I shudder of the nightmarish thought that Condoleezza Rice would be the next president (Ted Rall said all there was to say on her; and while he did badly misspell it - as Bomani Jones pointed out poignantly - he was nevertheless dead on target).
Back from politics to WBWs. WM's pondering on the kinship between the SUV <-> SBW notions made me look up for a brief moment. The terms however only appear related, as a brief reflection shows:
An SBW is expected to (and most often demanded and forced) to go repeatedly through the roughest terrain, and to sustain hardship and frequent abuse with very little maintenance, and on a very small budget;
(whereas) the SUV is mostly used by city slickers and soccer moms to transports kids and groceries on well-paved city streets and highways (digression: those parts of US cities where the paving is scantier and the potholes more frequent, are not exactly SUV breeding ground, as any brief inspection shows; they are also inhabited by other people than the usual SUV drivers, people who can easily be stowed away in tent camps for many months when their abodes have been washed away...).
And the SUV is well-maintained in regular interval, cared-for, and given ample fuel to guzzle away, while many SBWs run on a fraction of the monthly expenses of other people's SUVs.
Naah, the two notions are really not close, upon nearer examination :).
On First Ladies and (s!)heros by extension, I remember reading on someone's blog earlier when Alek Wek was asked how she started modelling and she goes "I was discovered....blah blah" ach! shame.
The XXs do not know how to shine brilliantly with a dash of modesty. W.M. here does if anything the students say are to go by.
I feel my brain cells tense up just reading thro' the blog so the lectures must be something. End of flattery session only I meant it.
You know, Prousette, fake modesty can be as dangerous as fake brilliance; maybe even more so, for fake pomposity at least has to be deflated (by however small an effort), while fake modesty can simply be agreed to and solemnly confirmed.
This is corroborated by millions of women's daily relationship experiences, you know. Take the following example:
Couple is preparing to attend an evening event. Black tie (at least). She has been busily beautifying herself, dressed to kill, and admiring her luscious image in the mirror, she's now turning left and right - ah, she'll just stun everybody! And so, just as to be sure and to start with the right confirmation, she asks her partner...
SHE (fishing for a compliment):
"Darling, don't you think I have become a bit too fat around the hips for this evening dress?"
HE, absently:
"Mhmm... yes, now that you say it... yes, I suppose you have."
(Then, trying to moderate what he said and thus adding insult to injury:)
"But you know, this dress is quite old, anyhow."
I’ve thought of my own mother, whom I have idolized my whole life, because she did just amazing things. She was the first this and the first that. She was the only African woman ever to do x. She left a lasting legacy through her work in y. She also managed to bring me up, protect and shelter me, and mould me into a competent human being…but what about her life? How often do I ask myself if she was ever frightened, insecure, confused, lost? How often do I ask if she ever yearned for opportunities lost, regretted decisions made, missed absent friends?
Gosh Horrifying truth, i almost cried when i remember of my own mother.
Brilliant Article, i refuse to SBW. I aint going to toil.HATE ME. You are prolific
The comments above between WM and Keguro look like intellectual conversation.
Keguro already loses me, plus WM i am lost.
You know your blog I read it for eeerrrmmm 15 minutes. 2 extra times to get the gist. You and Keguro.Tsk Tsk!
But, now that my little mind takes it in, this is am brilliant FUNNY post. You know I love that picture of Dorian Gray bo O.W.
And the funny? LOOOOOL "If I were ever to leap over a tall building at a single bound, I WOULD EXPECT SOME SERIOUS ATTENTION, ASTONISHMENT, ADORATION and for everyone to realize that having done all this leaping about, I would fairly obviously need a good long rest. Conversely, I most certainly would NOT appreciate having immediately presented to me another building, over which I am also expected to leap without question or hesitation"
That sums it for me.
I got tired of the SBW. Now, I be strong when I deem it and be weak...very weak...astonishingly weak when I feel like.
'This is the day that the awards committee will decide they want their fifty-thousand dollar grant back because your project is rubbish'...Oh gawd! Who have you been talking to? Is it me you are talking to? OMG! LOOOOOOOOL
And dont never stop writing. YOU ROCK. I love to read you always!!!
And Keguro is blamed, again.
What did I do? Was it the very appropriate word "hagiography?" (love love love that word!)
Isn't it interesting, though, to go back to your original post, how often we praise black women (see my post on domestic abuse and Mental's jazz variation, both of which, I must say, go well with wm's fugue, which incorporates and, dare I say, transcends both) . . . I forget where I started, so no clue on the correct punctuation.
One of the first things I learned when being de-programmed from cram-everything-in-one-night, otherwise known as 8-4-4, was to slow down when I read. We learn more when we pay attention to syntax and style. Even the most difficult authors (I've spent 2-3 hours trying to read a single page or passage from Hegel and Lacan)yield *something* if we take time. Conversely (to steal from wm quite brazenly), the simplest texts, the easiest to read, yield quite complex messages.
No preaching, but I will say this. I'm always stunned when people who grew up with methali and traditional proverbs and riddles complain about the difficulty or obscurity of prose, any prose. We learned some of the most complex ways of thinking and writing--read through kbw and you find an assortment of code-switching (languages, idioms), puns, metaphors that rival Borges, and formulations that betray highly-trained, highly-skilled minds. (See Adrian's latest on MS-Matatu Sarcasm. If you're of legal age, see Mutumia's musings on "sugarcane.") We-I say this collectively and with no little pride-have incredibly high writing and reading skills honed through years of constant, if inadvertent practice.
As WM keeps saying (have to keep changing case, to compensate for the "swelled head"), we have a lot to be proud of. But let's not forget that it did not come easy. Nothing does. But we learned and continue to learn.
Pedagogical moment over.
WM you rock, me loves your writing. And, I'm with you on finally binning this SBW nonesense.
Pole about your bad day, mine is so bad, you should see the state of my house, I won't mention my children or my job (I've taken time off from work), yaani, yours is kando.
So, chin up. If no one has outed me for the fraud I am (or right now feel I am), I bet no one will out you!!
And, I feel you on the Coretta saga.
@Prousette, I DON'T dream about cigars, ha ha!
@ Anon--I don't have a Vassar t-shirt, because I didn't GO to Vassar, I TAUGHT at Vassar, so that was not the college I was talking about. As for SUV's, sigh, I don't really care that much about the comparison. A moment of levity, taken too seriously and too literaly here.
@Prousette, thanks!
@Shiroh, yup, I feel you. But Keguro and I weren't saying anything particularly deep. I was saying that two fairly famous authors are difficult to read because of the complexity of their writing, and Keguro was saying that he learned to write from them, so I was teasing him by saying that obviously he's got a bigger CPU than the rest of us. That's it. Not very intellectual, really, we were just playing.
@Anon again, when you talk about false modesty, is it me you mean? I'm beginning to wonder what I did to you; obviously I rub a sore spot even when I'm not saying anything. It wasn't me who said the bit about modesty....
@ Kenyamusing, LOL! Ati errrrrm 15 minutes! It isn't because it's hard, it's because it's long. My, how I do go on. I'm feeling the WBW! As for the grant, LMBAO! I know the feeling, but you're probably about to get another one, so I wouldn't worry. I have no intention of ceasing or even slowing down my writing, never fear.
@Keguro, of course it was you and your hagiography, otherwise why would these thoughts ever have come to me? Stop leading me into trouble, you! I wouldn't have ventured into the Coretta waters otherwise, although I stick to my guns on that score. I agree with you on the prose bit (it only takes you 2-3 hours to read a page of Hegel or Lacan? Damn you're fast!) in both writing and reading senses. Plus I must add that some of the "difficulty" might be internal--we know that Hegel is supposed to be hard to read, and so Hegel becomes extremely hard to read. On the other hand, when I drop some Hegel on my students, and don't at first tell them about either his towering importance or about how complex he is supposed to be, they sort of read it in an innocent bumble-bee-doesn't-know-it-can't-fly way, and still get a lot out of it. And I certainly agree about the complexity and multi-layered meanings of the sorts of languages we come from. So the "gibberish" comment, which I think was misapplied, didn't throw me, mostly because I quite like what I write most of the time and secondly I don't think it is particularly complex, but if it is, then there's probably a reason for it, and finally because the people whose writing I like like my writing, if you see what I mean. In addition, of course, there are people who resent the use of some of the new forms of language that emerge from postmodernism, poststructuralism and postcolonialism, (although these three are not to be conflated or mixed up, which I think the "gibberish Anon" does, as he thought I was a postmodernist and it is prety obvious that I am not.) and will always regard these as being deliberately obscurantist and jargon-filled. I don't think my Anon critic would approve of your having learned how to write from Butler and Spivak,--do not think I didn't notice that you are on first name terms, nani!-- since by definition then, your writing too must contain jargon and obscure language, by his evaluation. Really, though, "jargon" just means that there is a certain vocabulary this anon does not like, however useful others might find it. I think this vocabulary is a matter of terms of art, a technical language if you will, that expresses concepts that are not available in other words, or other registers of writing. After all, we don't medical terms jargon, just because they don't say "tummy" or "bottom"! So it is all a matter of what you are trying to write about and what it is you think is important. Also perhaps, a matter of your level of tolerance and respect for others. Anyway, haidhuru! In the end, excellence of whatever sort is its own prerogative.
However, I will say again, there is always, always room for improvement in anyone's thinking and writing, so if people have constructive things to say about my writing, then I will always take them seriously. I may not ultimately agree, but I will take them seriously. Although, like I said, I begin to suspect this particular anon must have something personal against me, really. Which is a pity, since I don't know who he is, obviously don't think about him, and thus think it a pity that I figure so much larger in his imagination than he does in mine. I can't please everyone, so I'm just happy to be able to please the people that I do.
When did I say we have a lot to be proud of? I mean, we do, of course, but when did I say it? That was probably your thought, and since it is a good thought, I don't see why you are giving it away. Is that reverse plagiarism? LOL! Only Keguro!
@Estherling--what a cool name, by the way!--thank you very much. But LMAO "is she running for president?" I was rolling on the floor. I don't see what the big hungamma is, either, but, I like it when people express themselves, so let them all rock and roll! Anyway, the "bouting" brought you out of the woodwork where you had been hiding, didn't it? Definitely a huge plus for me, karibu!
@Chepkemboi, as you say, this too shall pass but while it's here, well, it's probably your mind's way of telling you need a rest or some spoling, or a good cry or a nice long bout of whining, all of which are extremely important. Thank you for the writing compliment. I'll take compliments anywhere, anytime! Especially about my writing!
Oh Pole, Estherling,
I forgot to say that you were right about the person I was speaking to about the digression: it wasn't to the one who answered, (or at least to the one who was telling me about Patricia Hill Collins) it was to the one from the blog before, with whom I had been exchanging jokes about my writing. Well spotted!
Concerning your own writing, WM, you have already ably said it yourself, in your very own comment (from Thursday, June 09, 2005 4:21:43 PM) to the first posting with which this blog did set out. What should I add to that, beyond the little characterization above in this present thread here?
Maybe only one thing: the reason why I esteem Judith Butler's academic writing (in spite of its undeniable difficulty), but rather not yours, is one and the same reason. Keguro has ably explained this reason with more pedagogic patience and tenderness than I could possibly muster here. So I'll just refer to him. Dixit et lavavit manus suas.
I too googled and found out interesting and wonderful stuff about your mum. This is an outstanding post, WM and captures many things I have always wanted to say.
Anon, I don't want to silence you in any way, but I've listened and thought about what you've said. I have. I really don't know, though, why you keep going over and over the same point, like picking a scab. Why on earth would it bother you so much? Why is this so important to you that you keep returning to it? And why is it ME specifically, with whom you concern yourself so diligently, when I don't know who you are, or why you are doing this, and under these circumstances I am unable to raise the same sort of interest in you that you have in me, for which I apologise. On the other hand, what IS this interest? It is beginning to feel like a strange form of stalking, really--and is very creepy since you are masked as anon. What's in this for you? Did I take a job you wanted, was I rude to your mother, did I inadvertently not pay the hommage you thought appropriate to some work of yours? Really, this can't be healthy for you. There is no real issue at stake here for me. Almost 30 people whose views and opinions I respect, whose writing I like and etc., like MY writing, even Keguro, whose views you seem to hold in some respect. You don't. Okay, what's the problem?
It is perfectly fine for you not to "esteem" my writing, since actually, you've done me a favour by getting all these other people to shower me with flowers and compliments and love and so on: which effectively took care of that bad day. Actually, I probably haven't had a better day for weeks than I did when reading all those comments in my support.
As various people have said, you know, it isn't as it is compulsory to read anything of mine, you know: neither blogs,nor dissertations, nor journal articles nor opinion pieces--you seem to have an allergic reaction to them. So I will repeat. Thank you for your comments, and I mean that sincerely. But this particular ground is beginning to look a bit muddy frankly, having been trod over so many times. Since Butler pleases you, then more power to you and go and read her stuff instead, which I also like. I honestly truly can't find even a point of argument to raise with you because I think we've covered everything, or other people have covered it on my behalf. So for me, this is enuff. You may, of course, continue to post as and when and how you see fitting, but I don't think I can spend more time responding to you. I am sorry to have to say that, but I'm just tired of it, frankly. And I am also a bit bewildered by your relentless name dropping which those of us not "in the know" cannot possibly follow. Do you want to show how learned you are? Okay, we'll take your word for it. Do you want us to know how intelligent you are? Again, we'll agree, if you say so.
Do you want to demonstrate your incredible power and thus authority to decide who is or is not worthy or an intellectual or ? Go right ahead. But don't expect the rest of us to be in the bus with you...we are going in different directions. As for my first post, I believe I said that Binyavanga was a rather special phenomenon and could do things with language that were simply glorious. Well yes. I stand by that. He is a better writer than just about everybody else I know. But he writes fiction, and I don't, so there's no competition or comparison, really. And if we're going to flog this horse, let me point out that the Binj loves my writing too and he trusts my judgement enough to let me edit him. So...again, problem? And that's all I'm going to say about that. I'm done.
@Mshairi,
I wanted to make this post quite distinct from the other to anon.
So, you found her did you? Delicious wasn't she? So she wasn't a Strong Black Woman, but she was a helluva woman and possibly the best friend I ever had--I learned to be silly from her. But I often hesitate to talk about her because a)I have severe problems with name-dropping and b) she belongs to so many other people than just me. There are young women right this minute, who are evoking her name, thinking about her and being reminded by her to keep their eyes on the prize, especially because it is February and all. I don't see that I have any particular precedence over these other voices (who need her more than I do really, or at least need the symbolism and image of her more than I do) and anyway, she is permanently in my head. I talk to her all the time. And I can hear her voice saying, "Eh nawe, Wambui!" I completely lucked out in the mother department, yes. But then, there are so many bits of her in other people, so many qualities of hers that I find all around me that she also taught me tolerance, and listening, and looking for the good in people (although I am still a cynic, I would probably have been much worse.) If people live on in the memories of others, she's never died, just become funker and funkier with the passage of time and the increase in the numbers of her fans. So, a cry/smile moment. Thanks.
I have just happened on this blog. Actually it would be more accurate to say that I just fell into this blog. Wambui is my prof. I have taken every single class she has ever taught, at this school anyway. I find the rude anon in question ridiculous. More importantly than all the other points that people raised, her lectures are incredible. My best friend wrote an essay contradicting one of her lectures completely, and she gave him an A! How many other profs would do that? I look forward to them, and they always seem to last fifteen minutes instead of two hours. I was ashamed when I read her SWB post, because for many of us students of color on this campus, she's our only option when we have a problem. We made her into our SWB, even those who aren't in her classes. So her office hours, which are supposed to last two hours, go on for five, or six. She doesn't leave until she has talked to the last student. She has never assigned her own work, unlike other professors who put all their works on the syllabus just to boast about how many people are reading them, or worse,their own books, to give themselves more money. However, in at least three other classes at UofT, her work is on her colleagues' syllabi, and she is read in at least three other universities that I know of. I love her writing and her approach. She was once in a lecture series whre she spoke just after THE Benedict Anderson; she outshone him without breaking a sweat. In fact, it was a no contest. Moreover, just look at her reading list for this year. I am a Politicsl Science major. Who else do you think would have the sheer guts and the nerve and the strength to face off against the old fogeys in the department and teach the following works to political science students. People carry her course pack around campus because it is cool to be in her class but mostly because hers is the only course pack with Malcolm X on the cover with the title "By any means necessary". Just about everyone from this class carries this course pack in their hand, never in their book bag. I've copied this reading list from the bookstore that is carrying her books this year--remember these are just the books and not the articles and chapters she also makes us read in the famous coursepack:
Discipline & Punish $21.00
Gender Trouble $30.95
Discourse on Colonialism $23.95
Introduction to the Phil of History $11.25
Orientalism $22.95
Key Concepts in Post-Colonial Studies $30.95
Location of Culture $30.95
Black Skin, White Masks $18.95
POL403S Colonial State
Wambui Mwangi
Colonialism & Homosexuality $49.50
Prostitution, Race & Politics $46.50
Carnal Knowledge $32.50
Exterminate all the Brutes $18.95
Mapping an Empire $35.75
Imperial Leather $42.95
Civilising Subjects $42.50
Picturing Imperial Power $29.95
Picturing Bushmen $32.50
Gone Primitive $23.50
Wretched of the Earth $19.50
Colonial Psychiatry & the African Mind $94.95 – special order only
A Princely Imposter $36.50
Enlightenment Against Empire $28.50
If I could clone her, I would be that clone. I SEE her several times a week, have listened to her lecture, have listened to her talks, have read her work both formal and informal and I feel no shame in saying that I worship the ground she walks on. So to the rude anon--shut the f*** up, and keep your dirty mitts off our prof. What have you done for us lately? You and your little piggy show off latin phrases and even piggier showing off of all the scholars and people you know. You are soooo 20th century, you conceited jerk!
Lowrider is of course not my real name, but if W.M. figures out who I am I shall die of embarassment.
Last point: about those people dissing her on RMP. I happen to know one of them, and yes, she failed his ass, so whoever it was who was reporting on student comments hit the nail on the head.
Now I have to go and read the 400 hundred pages our beloved prof has assigned for tomorrow. She throws people out of class who have not done the reading, so you can't play around. Hers is the hardest class I have ever taken, and the best. I honestly think I've become more intelligent from being in her classes. Not more informed, although that too, but actually experienced an increase in my I.Q.
Lowrider, what can I say to all that? As for clases, I assureyou , the pleasure is all mine. Go do your reading and I'm not even going to try to discover who you are because my embarassment would be exponentially greater than yours.
Hmm, so what's your take on Robert Aldrich and Ann Stoler? And on Imperial Leather? And on Colonial Psychiatry? Would you teach Black Hamlet? Have you read Hungochani (one of my new favorites)? How does Discipline and Punish speak to Britain's Gulag? What's your take on Gaurav Desai's Subject to Colonialism? Can I take an extended seminar with you where we address all these questions. (This is why you should be on my committee. Think of the conversations we'd have!)
Your reading list is SEXY!! Yes, I said it. Sexy.
400 pages? 400 pages? I get grief for assigning 100. But I do it anyway.
@Keguro. I have sent an impolitely long reply to your other email adress on the matter of the texts.
Yes, I quite like my syllabi, but some days I get discouraged because my 300 level class is starting everyone from scratch --and in political science!--and reading the "Names," you know...doing a genealogy (sp?) of the field. The graduate seminar is much more fun, as I have divided it into four sections, and in each section, there is at least ONE book that I haven't read and have been meaning to. I'm doing it again in the fall, and I'll change the sections, and include more books that I want to read. It's an incredibly fun class this one--it has a website all to itself, so the discussion starts before class, and we hit the ground running. I'm probably the most redundant person in the room, but I like listening anyway. So many new minds and new ways of interpretations! Have I mentioned that I love my job?
What level are you teaching that you can only assign 100 pages? They must be babies! My rule of thumb is 1st year: 100pg; 2nd year 200pgs; 3rdyr, 300 pgs; 4th yr; 400 pgs; graduates, at least one full book if not two. Of ocurse on the 300 class I cheated a bit, but it is sort of a crash course and they have to meet everyone from Stoler to Spivak to Harvey to whoever it is who wrote "Am I that name" etc. etc., so they simply just have to read and read and read, and it often works out to around 400 pages, or just a bit under. Let's say 350-380. Also, it is a bit like learning a new language, so the more they read, the more comfortable they become with it. But okay, I'll agree-yeah, it is SEXY innit?
Heh!
One more thing: Hungo-who? Please expound and no I obviously haven't read whoever it is.
HA! That's disciplinary, I suspect.
We are the poor people who teach "close reading." Yes, dear student, take two hours to read a 20 line poem.
Hungochani is Marc Epprecht's new book (historian of Southern Africa),the first full-length history of what he terms sexual dissidence in Southern Africa (he does SA, Zimbabwe, and a few other places). I've been reading him for a while. The book is really quite wonderful. More historical than conceptual, but lovely reading. Also, look out for Neville Hoad's book, should be out in the next year or so, I hope. Like you, he's frighteningly brilliant. Frightening. And I'm a fan.
@Everyone else: please excuse this little Keguro-Wambui volley. It just happens that I taught a particular book TODAY in my graduate seminar nad Keguro has read it, and we both hated it, so we get to go off on it. We'll be over it in a New York minute, we promise.
Your titles have been duly noted on my list and shall be ordered ASAP. But I don't like frighteningly brilliant people. They bring out my latent (this is a joke about Aldrich for whom everything was latent)aggression and heightens my arrogance, as my response is, well, so why is he better than me, eh??? P.S. I know someone who made Gayatri Spivak CRY TEARS of remorse on stage and in public. She's Somali. Don't mess with African women, I always say!
Okay people, we have now stopped having this ridiculous discussion.
However, I call your attention to the fact that Keguro, on his latest blog, says ati "I miss the giddiness of youth,". No, really, I swear he did. Because ati he is how old now? Cracks me up.
And I LOVE trash books. I have chestfuls of them. Nora Roberts, Eloise James, all the best bodice rippers, plus of course detective novels, from P.D. James and wakina Christie/Sawyer, and who was the other one? oh, Marsh. to the Ellis peters and Josephine Teys. LOVE THEM!! Oh, and Elizabeth George and Martha Grimes and...so forth. These are the pre-whatsit that clear my palate to read Jean-Luc Nancy.
(Incomprehensible digression for Keguro's eyes only: No, not Bataille or Baudrillard. Older. Guy who wrote about the evolution of manners/civility in France. But definitely B.)
Lakini lets do all this on private email--I don't really like mixing my genres, and I don't want to contaminate my blog by suddenly sprouting off about random things of no interest to anybody except myself, maybe you, and possibly one or two others. The reason I started this blog was precisely as a refuge and sanctuary from all dat. (Ah! I've just remembered. The whats-it above is a "palate cleanser!") Blogging opens my mind, frees it from its academic constraints, leaves it receptive to other ways of saying and doing and being, and thus, just does amazing things for my mind, forces me to think about things from perspectives that you would never find in an academic setting, teaches me what counts --thus rescuing me from the bog of ever diminishing circles of theory--and just, well, its where I like to come to pretend that I am normal and not really insane. Also where I come to laugh hysterically, because you can't beat Kenyan humuor. Also where I come to know what thinking Kenyans are thinking about Kenya, so I don't get swallowed up in the North American Machine. Also where I come to find and explore new intersts--the things that people blog about! He!--etc. etc. etc.
As far as my mind goes, it is the other side of the coin. If academic stuff is tails, then blog stuff and related ventures is heads. Together, inseparable, but different.
@everyone who has emailed me on this point:
While I abide by my resolution not to answer the provocations of a certain person, I feel it incumbent upon me to assure those of you who may have checked and consequently been as confused as I was that I DID NOT have a blog on June 09 2005. There was one on June 07 and again on June 10th. So, no, you aren't going insane and no, you didn't erase or miss a post. Also, yes, you are quite right, this was NOT my first blog. There is nothing wrong with your computers or your blogger software. From now on, I suggest that you disregard statements and proclamations coming from a certain quarter--they are sure only to cause confusion. I apologize for the momentary, um, disquiet this caused to those of you who consequently emailed me (gosh you people are fast on the ball!)but everything is fine. I hope all is now clarified and sense-making.
Please, just ignore the source of this confusion. He only gets worse, and he gets off at making all of us scramble around searching for non-existent posts. It isn't worth it. At least not to me. I've responded this time, not to him, but to the six of you who emailed me about the "missing" post. I don't however, even want to talk ABOUT him in the future, let alone TO him. It is not an advantageous use of anyone's time, and I resent having to fight fires which he has lit. I won't do it again. so this is another "this is it."
Thou shalt not give false testimony, not even by negligence. You wrote exactly what I alluded to, exactly on that very day, and unlike the recent "Love Letter to the Central Bank", you have not yet erased it... :-)
As I precisely wrote, it was a comment of yours to your own first existent blog entry. I should benignly presume that you know what "comment" means, especially if the blog software itself calls it a "comment". Now, would you like to see you quoted verbatim? Here you are:
"I can't write, but he's one of my favourite people, so I am happy that HE can write, for mex55> Yup, that's about right.
Thursday, June 09, 2005 4:21:43 PM"
I am certainly not the one to disagree with this honest self-assessment. Especially since "he" (B.W.) truly is an excellent writer, so at least you chose a worthy favourite.
Ah, yes, all true. But I think your post fails to go the one step beyond. It is when we realise that the woman in our lives (in this case, my mother) has done all that she has DESPITE the lack of the mythical Superwoman strength, that the awe surely checks in. When you 'grow up', and realise that the tribal secrets that you thought were whispered to you when you became an adult are all a myth, and that it is a bewildering and scary period of life, THAT's when your total respect for that woman, in all her flawed perfection, manifests itself.
Not B.
Elias--is that who you mean?
Wallace,
Is that you?
Let the heavenly chorus rejoice.
I never had any tribal secrets whispered to me, so I'll have to trust you on that. But whenever the realisation comes, it hits quite hard. Karibu sana!
Keguro
Not Elias. This is like jeopardy for nerds! Wait, if I don't think about it, it will come. But now you've made me doubt myself, was it not B? No, I'm sure it was B,..I think.
@The stupid Anon,
Please, SHUT UP!!
You are boring the hell out of the rest of us. Go play with yourself or something (actually, that's probably what you ARE doing) but do it somewhere else.
I support Fred.
W.M. I wanted you to know that I wrote a letter to my mother. I thanked her for all the things I had never thought of thanking her for before I read your blog. Thank you so much. (I cried too)
Prof, I know we are supposed to be ignoring him, but just this once, okay?
Anon. I am writing very slowly. I want to be sure that you understand. Mr. Binyavanga Wainaina came to speak here. We all loved him. He loves the Prof. We love the Prof. Do you notice something? No? I'll tell you. You are not in this story. You are not welcome here. Leave.
WM here I am to say am not lost and have come to find something so strong this is soo nice and amazing.
Lovely weekend..
keep writing! Francois de La Rochefoucauld said it best when he said "Mediocre minds usually dismiss anything which reaches beyond their own understanding."
I almost always have to print out your posts, which I read either on the bus/train, or when I can't sleep. This is no exception.
There's the length*cough*, and somedays the sunrise-yellow just simply refuses to work with my eyes- more importantly, you speak such truths I feel the need to fully absorb.I luuurve your writing. It's so good I'm not intimidated, I aspire to express myself as you do(maybe better someday? ha!
Keep well.:)
I find imperfection to have a certain allure, possibly becaue I am so evident of my own. I really don't like flawless people who have it all together. Women or otherwise.
Well.
For what it's worth, I love Wambui's work. Am not really sure what Anon1 was trying to do: that kind of 'parallel' analysis does not make sense to me, though I was dutifully intimidated by the Latin....This is why I have avoided blogland - that irresistable desire - based on a feeling of a kind of ownership some people have - to tell you just why they cannot stand your writing/politics/opinion.
What kind of response is one meant to give? And what would be the purpose of such an approach? If you say 'F" off, they think you are not capable of recieving criticism.
I appreciate that people do this with good intentions sometimes - not realising that the things they have 'pent up' to discuss with you do not come to them because the 'issue matters'. Mostly, they are only really seeking a victory, a 'submission' - to 'put you in your place'
Oh the hidden objectivities we use as hoists!
I love you too, Binj.
Whether I can write, write well or not, I have to write, so it isn't a multiple choice question for me. I'm pleased and flattered that those I admire like my stuff. But I would do it anyway.
I had actually posted this a few days ago, but some people wrote to me to say that they could view it in one format but not another, and some to say that they couldn't see it again. So I am re-posting it, and if you've already seen it, just ignore it.
See below.
Alas, I was too eager in my "Wallace" Kantai identification. However, all Kantai's, of whatever calling, are always welcome in my house.
@Anon (which one are you?) thank you for the links. I was going to do a super-duper priviledged post on my super-duper secret knowledge, but that's sort of shattered now, ey? (I'm in the Great White North, I have to say "ey?") That'll teach me to think that I am special. Ha!
BTW, for those who wondered where the love letters went, I had an undertaking to only have the post up for a while. I try to keep my promises.
Nakeel!! Welcome back! I've missed you, and you have a lovely weekend too. Don't go away for too long next time.
Joe, I can always use all the support I can get. Thank you, and come round anytime. Shalom!
@Everyone: despite certain distractions, this is one of the loveliest experiences I have ever had. Props to all of you, and I am on an " appreciate even more all those you used to think were SBW" bender right now. To all my heroes out there (Tata, are you there?) thank you for your weaknesses, your tears, your despair, and for the lesson learned. I'll try harder, always, but I'll be gentler to myself too.
Everyone, pick a formerly-thought-to-be SBW and do a "Bliss" on her. Thanks again, Bliss, for showing the way. Peace, out.
--
Posted by WM to Diary of a Mad Kenyan Woman at 2/04/2006 02:45:20 AM
WM - I now know why we are almost the same age: so that you would get to be my professor. I would have flunked a class with as extensive a reading list. Haiya! And what is all this fightign going on around here when I have been trying to relax in Malindi? I suspect that the same anon has been running around my blog throwing down some insults. But I, unlike WM who is not from Nyeri like I am, will not bother to fight with words. I will just hunt him down and unleash some ngotos his way. WM, never underestimate the power of the ngoto - those folded knuckles rapped on the skull have pushed many an idiot to clearer thought. OK, see you in Nairobi!
As for you Keguro, reading Spivak with such glee is bad for your health. It is true. Last year, a student at Oxford was found with blood trickling out of his ear, in a deep coma. Lying before him was an open Spivak book. In another well documented incident, a Kenyan PhD candidate in London (he studies war for very warlike purposes) was found roaming the streets naked in the middle of the night. He was heard to repeatedly moan 'strategic essentialism is good for me' and 'I wish I was a subaltern'. He has not yet recovered. Keguro, I care for you, don't ever claim you have not been warned:-)
BTW, WM: I meant that I am glad that we are agemates so that you could not get to be my prof unless I had done some serious rewinding. That list was too much.
@MMK, yes, i understood what you meant the first time, notwhithstanding the missing "not".
But nani, I'm still going to come to give talks at your institution, so the horror, the horror, is not over yet! As for people reading Spivak, ati Nekked? Whoooo! Perhaps should be read only when in restraints. Or don't read it at all, just ask Keguro for summaries. This last is the route that I am preparing to go. Do you know he calls her "Gayatri"? and Butler "Judith"? Clearly, we should just copy his notes. Salaams, and (whatareyourdoinginMalindi) see you soon.
@Everyone, post-MMK. May I point out that the reading list given above by lowrider is for TWO classes, and that one of them is a year long and the other a graduate seminar. I know I'm a hard case, but I am not as bad as that!
How did I miss this? Where have I been?
I discarded the SBW myth a long time ago and these days I simply revel in my weak moments. Because if I play it right, they result in clarity. And even if I mess it up, my weak moments allow me to explore the ever-growing reaches of my strength and resilience..
Eh and ebu let me catch up on this Anon A and Anon B and Anon C business. I am so lost.
As for me, you know I absolutely love you!
Ok, this is where I begin to feel like a total blonde. I have always loved your blog even thugh I didn't really know who you are. To me you're WM. The mad Kenyan woman. That's it.
Now I begin to realise who, what you are. Wow!
OMG I just googled you. I am speechless.
Ms K. yeah! Where HAVE you been?
Googling is bad for your health. You were right the first time: I AM just W.M. the mad Kenyan woman. And I love you too.
Ms. K. I was wondering if you've ever read a book called "when Chickenheads Come Home to Roost" it is an INCREDIBLE and poetic book by feminist writer Joan Morgan(also a fromer SBW) who dedicates an entire chapter to dispelling the myth of the SBW. what you wrote totally reminded me of the book.
Post a Comment